A hospital wireless network must support many different types of users and devices, including:
* Visitors who access the Internet
* Admin staff, who run applications such as scheduling
* Medical staff, who look up patient info on their tablets
* Patient monitoring devices, which must not lose any traffic
* Communicator badges, which support real-time voice to allow nurses and doctors to communicate The hospital needs to ensure that the most vital and time-sensitive traffic is prioritized and that visitors do not interfere with hospital applications. The MC should mark traffic that passes through it for an appropriate priority.
Which plan meets the needs? (The plans describe firewall roles and rules but do not need to use correct syntax. Note that security roles are also not included.)

• A. Communicator = Highest. Patient monitoring = Highest. Medical staff = High. Admin staff = Normal: Visitors = Low.
• B. Medical staff = Highest. Communicator = High. Patient monitoring = High. Admin = High. Visitors = Normal
• C. Patient monitoring = Highest. Medical staff = Highest. communicators = High. Admin staff = High. Visitors = Normal.
• D. Medical staff = Highest. Patient monitoring = Highest. Admin staff - High. Communicator = Normal. Visitors = Low.

An archinect needs lo plan a Mobility Master (MM) solution for a customer Requirements include:
* redundancy for the MM
* redundancy for the MCS (seamless failover if up to one fails)
The wireless network consists of
* total APs - 300
* total wireless devices = 20,000
* total MCs = 10
The customer wants the most cost-effective plan that meets me requirements.
Which plan for MMs should the architect select?

• A. 2 MM-HW-1QK
• B. 1 MM-HW-5K and 1 MM-VA-1K
• C. 1 MM-HW-5K and 1 MM-HW-1K
• D. 2 MM-HW-5K

A network architect needs to plan quality of service (QoS) for a hospital network.
Which of these applications should receive the highest priority?

• A. MRI image transfer
• B. wireless voice communicator devices
• C. streaming IPTV in lobbies
• D. cloud-based scheduling software

A company already has an Aruba wireless network The network currently consists of:
* oneMM-HW-1k
* two 7210 MCs in the network core
* two 721GMCsintheDMZ
* 200 AP-515S in Building 1 and Building 5
100 AP-515S each In Building 2r Building 3, and Building 4
The customer now wants to assess if it needs local Mobility controllers (MC) for any buildings:
- Building 1 is the main office building for the campus. It supports the highest number of APs. It connects to the network core without an aggregation layer.
* Building 2 is further away from the Building i. and no roaming is provided between it and the other buildings its access layer connects to the network cone with a pair of Aruba CX 6300M aggregation switches.
* Building 3 is further away from the other buildings, it connects to the network core without an aggregation layer.
The Guest SSID traffic should be tunnelled to the DMZ controllers
' Building 4 has its own local datacenter and Internet connection. The company would like it to be able to operate completely autonomously if its aggregation layer loses connectivity with the core.
* Building 5 is further away from the other buildings, it connects to the network core without an aggregation layer.
This building has been assigned to a partner that would like to manage a dedicated SS1D using the shared AP infrastructure.
In which two buildings should the network architect plan local mobility controllers (MCs)? (Select two)

• A. Building 4
• B. Building 3
• C. Building 2
• D. Building 1
• E. Building 5

Refer to the exhibit.

A customer needs a wired upgrade for a building on its main campus. The exhibit shows the switches that the architect has selected for each closet and me existing cabling. The customer is not open to changing the cabling.
The customer requires link redundancy for the uplinks from each closet and for the links from the building to the core. In non link failure situations, the uplinks from each closet must support at least 20Gbps, and the building as a whole must have at least 20 Gbps to the core in non link failure situations Which two options Tor connecting the closets to the network core are valid? (select two.)

• A. Add two aggregation switches in the Floor 1closet. Connect the switch stack for each closet to the aggregation switches on two fiber links each and the aggregation switches to the core on two fiber links.
• B. Connect me Floor 2 switch stack to Floor 1 with two fiber connections, DO me same for Floor 3. connect the Floor 1 switch stack to the network cone with two fiber connections.
• C. Combine the nine switches on the three floors into a single switch stack with the MM QM3 fiber cables in a ring topology. Connect two Floor 1 members to the network core with one fiber connection each.
• D. Combine the nine switches on all three floors into a single switch slack with stacking cables in a ring topology.
  Connect two Floor f members to the network core with one fiber connection each
• E. Connect the switch stack on each floor directly to the network cone on two "fiber connections per floor. Achieve this by patching the inter-floor fiber through to the inter-building fiber.